React FAQ
← All metros

How many nuclear reactors would it take to power San Antonio?

Scenario estimates of how many reactors of various sizes would be required to cover the San Antonio–New Braunfels, TX metro's annual electricity demand — and what it would take with other power sources.

Population
2,813,140
Annual electricity demand
46,105,197 MWh
Primary state
TX

Reactors needed to power San Antonio

Switch between reactor sizes. Each tab shows the count, the icon grid scaled to that count, and rough capital cost bands. Default view is large reactors — the fewest, biggest units.

Reactors needed
6
× 1,117 MWe units
93% capacity factor

Conventional gigawatt-scale plants like the AP1000 deliver firm baseload power with the smallest land footprint per MWh of any source. Build times are 7–12 years for first-of-a-kind delivery; the largest tradeoff vs alternatives.

Capital cost (rough)
Mid: NREL ATB 2024 · High: delivered Vogtle/NuScale
$46.9B$67.0B$100.5B

San Antonio's current energy usage

Where the metro's grid actually gets its power today, and how its electricity demand has trended over the last 25 years.

Today's grid mix
eGRID 2023 subregion ERCT — ERCOT All
50% Natural gas
largest source · 2023
Natural gas 49.6%
Wind 22.6%
Coal 12.7%
Nuclear 8.5%
Solar 5.9%
Other 0.6%
Hydro 0.1%

Replacing the fossil portion (62% of generation) with nuclear would avoid roughly 10,540,10217,847,370 tons of CO₂ per year for this metro's share of demand. Range uses EPA eGRID 2023 Total Output rate (low) and Non-baseload rate (high) for ERCT. See methodology.

Annual electricity demand
TX state total — all sectors
+63.4%
20012025
0250M500M750M1B200120052010201520202025

What it takes to power San Antonio with alternative energy sources

Same annual MWh as the reactor scenarios — just translated to other source archetypes. Variable sources (solar, wind) include a firm-equivalent figure for storage-backed 24/7 power. Switch tabs to compare.

Utility solar farm (100 MW DC)
211
units · 100 MW each
52.8M panels (≈400W each)
Firm equivalent (with storage)
528844
Units needed for round-the-clock firm power equivalent to one baseload reactor. Range covers oversizing + storage + curtailment modeling (NREL Standard Scenarios + Lazard LCOE+LCOS).
Land
198 sq mi
Capacity factor
25%
CO₂ (annual)
Zero
Per MWh CO₂
0 lb

Variable output. Raw count assumes same annual MWh; firm equivalent accounts for storage and oversizing needed for 24/7 power.

All sources, scaled to San Antonio

Every source overlaid on the metro outline at true scale. The visual gut-check on land use: nuclear's footprint nearly disappears against firm-equivalent renewables.

All sources, scaled to San Antonio-New Braunfels

Each colored square shows the land area a single source would need to cover this metro's entire 46.1 TWh of annual electricity demand — drawn at the same scale as the metro outline below it. Solar and wind use firm-equivalent capacity (with storage) per NREL Standard Scenarios.

Onshore wind
685 sq mi · 9.4% of metro
Utility-scale solar PV
183 sq mi · 2.5% of metro
Nuclear · Large Reactor
7.8 sq mi · 0.11% of metro
Coal-fired plant
5.6 sq mi · 0.08% of metro
Natural gas (combined cycle)
480 acres · 0.01% of metro
Local resource: Strong solar + wind resources in central Texas.
Download PNGOpen in new tabFree to use with attribution to reactfaq.com

Data provenance

Demand basis
TX state per-capita × metro population (v2 methodology, 2025 basis year)
Demand period
historical state trend: 2001–2025
Population source
U.S. Census Vintage 2025 estimates
Reactor cost basis
NREL ATB 2024, with widened bands for FOAK uncertainty
Grid mix source
EPA eGRID 2023 (subregion ERCT)
Source comparisons
Hardcoded archetypes — see methodology page

These figures are screening-level scenario estimates. They are not forecasts, project proposals, or permitting determinations.